Developing a Poverty Measurement Scorecard: Predicting MPCE for Microfinance Clients in Urban Delhi

Authors

  • Dr. Vandana Sethi Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Motilal Nehru College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13340543

Keywords:

poverty measurement tool (pmt), scorecard development, microfinance institutions (mfi), predictive accuracy, consumption expenditure (mpce)

Abstract

A scorecard is a poverty measurement tool (PMT) that helps microfinance institutions (MFI) to measure and track the poverty status of their clients. It uses some verifiable indicators from the national expenditure survey, to get a score that is highly correlated with poverty. In the present study, an attempt has been made to develop a scorecard using the stepwise OLS regression method, to predict the MPCE of MFI’s clients. The NSS 68th round (2011-12) data on consumption expenditure for urban Delhi has been used for this purpose. The predictive accuracy of the regression model (scorecard) is assessed by comparing the poverty status predicted by our scorecard with the “true” poverty status as established by the NSSO data. The “Total Accuracy” criterion is used which identified 89.39% of the respondents correctly. Thus, the scorecard appears to be a fairly accurate tool for assessing the poverty status of MFI’s clients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adjei, J. K., & Arun, T. (2009). Microfinance programmes and the poor: whom are they reaching? Evidence from Ghana. Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper Series, 7209, 265-291.

Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries. United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report Office Background Paper.

Ford Foundation and CGAP. (2010). Poverty targeting and measurement tools in microfinance, Progress out of Poverty Index and the Poverty Assessment Tool.

Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1979). Measures of association for cross classifications. In measures of association for cross classifications, pp. 2-34. New York: Springer.

India Development Foundation (IDF). (February 2011). Counting the (net) number of people who crossed (from below) the USD 1.25 a day consumption threshold in India between 1990 and 2010.

IRIS Centre (2005). Note on Assessment and Improvement of Tool Accuracy, Available at: http://www.povertytools.org/other_documents/AssessingImproving_Accuracy.pdf.

IRIS Centre. (2007). Client Assessment Survey—India. Available at: http://www.povertytools.org/USAID_documents/Tools/Current_Tools/USAI. D_PAT_India_8-2007.xls, accessed July 7, 2008.

IRIS Centre (2010). Accuracy Results for 26 Poverty Assessment Tool Countries, Available at: http://www.povertytools.org/other_documents/Accuracy%20Notes/PAT_26_country_accuracy_result s_Jan2010.pdf.

Planning Commission. (2011). Report of the working group on urban poverty, slums, and service delivery system. New Delhi: Government of India.

Schreiner, M. (2008). A simple poverty scorecard for India. Available http://www.microfinance.com/English/Papers/Scoring_Poverty_India.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-29

How to Cite

Sethi, V. (2024). Developing a Poverty Measurement Scorecard: Predicting MPCE for Microfinance Clients in Urban Delhi. Management Journal for Advanced Research, 4(2), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13340543

Issue

Section

Articles