History of Industrial Relations
The history of excellent and bad labour relations in a corporation cannot be avoided. A successful company's history may be traced back to harmonious interaction between management and employees. Militant protests and lockouts have a dismal history. There is a tendency for recurrence in both sorts of history.
Fulfillment in Mental and Social Realms
An important part of building healthy labour relations is identifying social and psychological needs of workers. Bread alone will not suffice to sustain one's existence. When hiring him, employer needs to take into account more than just his physical needs. Human and social interactions are at heart of an organization's joint effort, and each member feels that he is addressing his own needs while also assisting others. Employee participation in management, job enrichment, suggestion programmes, and grievance resolution are just a few examples of kinds of social and psychological rewards necessary in this type of work environment.
Employers and Employees Dispute
When it comes to training, education, experience and attitudes, both management and workers' representation in domain of industrial relations come from a wide range of backgrounds. The nature of labour relations is profoundly influenced by varying experiences of employees from all around world. Good in workplace tend to establish an environment that is conducive to development of an equitable collective bargaining agreement in general. Collective bargaining is difficult for people who lack education and experience since it is a complex human activity that incorporates people's emotions and money.
Unions Need to be Educated
Having a strong and well-informed labour movement is essential to ensuring that workers' rights are protected while also protecting interests of management. This emphasis on employee contributions and responsibilities should be emphasised in unions.
Conclusion
According to findings, industrial relations are foundation for higher production at lower costs and higher profits in any organization or company. Industrial relations that are good reduce industrial disputes and complex issues that plague modern industrial society. Without labour cooperation and harmonious relationships, industrial progress is impossible. "Industrial Relations" is a term used to describe working relationship between employees and their employers. It is, however, preferable to establish and maintain positive relationships between employees (labour) and employers (management).
An effective industrial relationship leads to an increase in organization's productivity. There are conflicting and compromising forces on both sides of industrial relations system. Both employer and employees have a responsibility to put out fires and work together in good faith in order to benefit society as a whole. In order to resolve interpersonal problems and disagreements, one must use persuasion and even force. The elements that lead to conflict must be dealt with in a constructive manner. Employees and labour (and, in many cases, trade unions), and government are all involved. Despite fact that there is bound to be some conflict between these groups, there are usually procedures in place to make sure that it is kept under control or even allowed to happen. The company has implemented more effective welfare activities, which have resulted in a more productive working environment. The company provides various types of welfare schemes to its employees, such as medical benefits, a bereavement fund, life insurance, a place to live and a way to get about, and a social club, and so on, in order to improve industrial relationship. Social difficulties will be eliminated as a result of this caused by a lack of ineffective implementation of collective bargaining agreements practises in organizations, primarily oil and gas companies in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
References
1. Kerr, C, Dunlop, J. T., Harbism F., & Myers, C.A. (1960). Industrialism and industrial man. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
2. Kapoor T.N. (1968). Personnel management and industrial relation in India. India: Himalaya Publishing House.
3. Kuhn, James W., Lewin, David, McNulty, & Paul J. (1983). Neil W. Chamberlain: A retrospective analysis of his scholarly work and influence.British Journal of Industrial Relations, 21(2), 143-160.
4. Nwachukwu Precious Ikechukwu., Aroh Grace Onyekachi., & Tamuno, Daniel Achori. (2019). Social challenges of industrial relations: A study of federal polytechnic oil and gas, bonny, rivers state, Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 9(3), 82-88.
5. Lvancevich, J.M. & et al. (1997). Management: Quality and competitiveness. (2nd). Boston: McGraw - Hill.
6. Dibua, V. A. (2003). Fundamentals of industrial relations. (1st). Ibadan: Safmos Publishers.
7. Ackers Peter; & Wilkinson Adrian. (2005). British industrial relations paradigm: A critical outline history and prognosis.Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(4), 443–456.
8. Ratnam, C.S.V. (2006). Industrial relations. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
9. Anyim, F.C, Ikemefuna, C.O., & Ekwoaba, J.O. (2012). Dunlopian theory: Impact and relevance to Nigeria industrial relations system. Journal of Management and Business Studies, 2(2), 039-045.
10. Kumari Pallavi. (2013). Problem and prospects of industrial relation in coal industry. Spectrum: A Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(6). Available at: https://docplayer.net/24157350-Problem-and-prospect-of-industrial-relation-in-coal-industry-with-special-reference-to-c-c-l-ranchi.html.
11. Mullins, Laurie J. (2016).Management and organisational behavior. (11th ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.ISBN978-1-292-08848-8.