There is significant difference between the Occupational status of the respondents and Preference while making a purchase decision.
Educational Qualification and Attitude towards Organized Retail Outlets
Hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between the Educational Qualification of the respondents and Attitude towards Organized Retail Outlets
Table 6: Educational Qualification and Attitude towards Organized Retail Outlets
Source of Variation | Sum ofSquares | Degrees offreedom | Meansquares | FValue | Pvalue | Result |
---|
Between groups | 1087.630 | 4 | 271.908 | 10.06 | .001 | S |
Within groups | 26616.962 | 995 | 26.6 |
Total | 27704.592 | 999 | |
S- Significant (P value ≤ 0.05); NS – Not significant (P value > 0.05) Inference
As the p value (0.001) is less than 0.05, the hypothesis is rejected (Significant) at 5% level of significance.
There is significant difference between the Educational qualification of the respondents and Attitude towards Organized Retail Outlets.
4.7 Occupational Status and Perception towards Organized Retail Outlets
Hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between the Occupational status of the respondents and Perception towards Organized Retail Outlets.
Table 7: Occupational Status and Perception towards Organized Retail Outlets
Source of Variation | Sum ofSquares | Degrees offreedom | Meansquares | FValue | Pvalue | Result |
---|
Between groups | 5923.666 | 6 | 987.278 | 17.3 | .000 | S |
Within groups | 56404.996 | 993 | 56.6 |
Total | 62328.662 | 999 | |
S- Significant (P value ≤ 0.05); NS – Not significant (P value > 0.05) Inference
As the p value (0.000) is less than 0.05, the hypothesis is rejected (Significant) at 5% level of significance.
There is significant difference between the occupational status of the respondents and Perception towards Organized Retail Outlets.
4.8 Occupational Status and Attitude towards Organized Retail Outlets
Hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between the Occupational status of the respondents and Attitude towards Organized Retail Outlets
Table 8: Occupational Status and Attitude towards Organized Retail Outlets
Source of Variation | Sum ofSquares | Degrees offreedom | Meansquares | FValue | Pvalue | Result |
---|
Between groups | 4275.470 | 6 | 712.578 | 14.994 | .000 | S |
Within groups | 23429.122 | 493 | 47.524 |
Total | 27704.592 | 499 | |
S- Significant (P value ≤ 0.05); NS – Not significant (P value > 0.05) Inference
As the p value (0.000) is less than 0.05, the hypothesis is rejected (Significant) at 5% level of significance. There is significant difference between the occupational status of the respondents and Attitude towards Organized Retail Outlets.
Conclusion
The concept retail which includes the shopkeeper to customer interaction, has taken many forms and dimensions, from the traditional retail outlet and street local market shops to upscale multi brand outlets, especially stores or departmental stores. Though at this moment, it is still premature to say that the Indian retail market will replicate the success stories of names such as Wal-Mart stores, Sainsbury and Tesco but atleast the winds are blowing in the direction of growth. The retail stores are soon emerging on the top priority lists, amongst the shopping spree in various cities, as they seem to derive immense pleasure of convenience and exposure to variety under one roof, in their extremely busy lives, when they don’t have time for things.in this context the present study assessed the preferences of consumers with special reference to Coimbatore district.
References
1, Karanja N.K., Njenga, M., Prain, G., Kangethe, E., Kironchi, G., Githuku, G., Kinyari P., & Mutua, G.K. (2010). Assessment of environmental and public health hazards in wastewater used for urban agriculture in Nairobi, Kenya to tropical and subtropical agroecosystems. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 12(1), 85-97.