E-ISSN:2583-1747

Research Article

Garments industries in Tirupur

Management Journal for Advanced Research

2022 Volume 2 Number 4 August
Publisherwww.singhpublication.com

An Empirical Analysis of Factors Influencing Reward and Recognition Systems Followed in Selected Garments Industries in Tirupur

Rajeswari R1*, Balamurugan D2
DOI:10.54741/mjar.2.4.2

1* Rajeswari R, Research Scholar, Department of Management Science, Parks College, Tirupur, India.

2 D Balamurugan, Associate Professor, Department of Management Science, Parks College, Tirupur, India.

Even though people work for salary or wages (rewards), there are numerous ways of rewarding (motivating) employees according to the task or function performed. The underlying principle for the use of rewards is to motivate or induce behaviours among employees which are viewed as beneficial for enhanced performance whilst inhibiting other behaviours which employers and managers perceive as detrimental to organizational effectiveness and efficiency. Thus, rewards serve as a means of motivating desired behaviors. Incentives, rewards and recognitions are the prime factors that impact on employee motivation. Many researchers opined that, employees who are well motivated serve as the competitive advantage for any company because their performance leads an organization to accomplishment of its goals. Among financial, economic and human resources. human resources are the most vital that can provide a company’s competitive edge as compared to others. The main aim of the study is to examine the impact of reward and recognition on job satisfaction and motivation. The present study assess the Factors influencing reward and recognition systems followed in selected garments industries in Tirupur.

Keywords: salary, rewards, desired behaviors Incentives, garments industries in Tirupur

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Rajeswari R, Research Scholar, Department of Management Science, Parks College, Tirupur, , India.
Email:
Rajeswari R, Balamurugan D, An Empirical Analysis of Factors Influencing Reward and Recognition Systems Followed in Selected Garments Industries in Tirupur. Manag. J. Adv. Res.. 2022;2(4):9-15.
Available From
https://mjar.singhpublication.com/index.php/ojs/article/view/20

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2022-07-04 2022-07-20 2022-08-04
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
None Nil Yes 10.22

© 2022by Rajeswari R, Balamurugan Dand Published by Singh Publication. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

As Bowen argued, in a world of downsizing which is characterized with doing more with less, reward and recognition are pivotal factors to boosting morale and creating goodwill between employees and managers. Malhotra et al. (2007) define rewards as ‘all forms of financial return, tangible services and benefits an employee receives as part of an employment relationship’. Employers expect employees to deliver or execute assigned duties to their satisfaction whilst employees also expect their employers to assure them of adequate wages and salaries (rewards) after they dutifully deliver what is expected of them (Eshun and Duah, 2011). Reward is something given or received in return or recompense for service, merit, hardship, etc . The Cambridge dictionary defined it as “something given in exchange for good behavior or good work”. Some theorists also refer to reward as compensation. Mathis and Jackson (2004) are of the view that, compensation rewards people for performing organizational work through pay, incentives and benefits. The ability to achieve the company’s critical business goals is the preferred criteria imposed by majority of organizations today to reward their employees. Mayo (1998) argues that, many companies are unable to instill the joy of working in performing duties and responsibilities if there are inadequate rewards being promised. Again, reward provides a visible means of promoting quality efforts and telling employees that the organization values their efforts (Evans and Lindsay, 2003).

Types of Reward Rewards may be classified into extrinsic/external and intrinsic/internal. Shanks (2007, p 30) posits, extrinsic rewards “are a host of external things (tangible) that managers can provide that may serve as incentives for employees to increase their productivity”. These, among others, include; money, benefits, flexible schedules, promotion, job responsibilities, change in status, praise and feedback, a good boss, a nurturing organisational culture, etc. Tangible rewards (financial rewards) may be direct or indirect. Direct financial rewards refer to the pay an employee receives in the form of wages, salaries, bonuses, commissions, incentives, merit pay, stock options, etc. That is to say, direct financial rewards constitute base pay and variable pay (performance-base pay).

Base pay refers to the basic pay an employee receives which may be a wage or salary and usually influenced by external and internal factors. The former include conditions in the labour market, market rates, government influences, etc. Whilst the latter comprises factors such as job evaluation, collective bargaining with employees’ representatives, individual agreements, etc. These rewards are based on time worked and they constitute the bases on which majority of employees are compensated directly (Mathis and Jackson, 2004; Schuler, 1998).

Recognition and facets

Employees do not only want attractive pay and benefits, but also expect that their efforts are valued, appreciated and treated fairly. According to Harrison (2011- retrieved from recognitionreward.blobspot.com on 19/09/2011), recognition is the timely, informal or formal acknowledgement of a person’s or team’s behaviour, effort or business result that supports the organization’s goals and values, and which usually is beyond normal expectations.

To Brun and Dugas, 2008, recognition represents a reward experienced primarily at the symbolic level, but may also take on emotional, practical or financial value. Deeprose (1994) argued that the motivation of employees and their productivity can be enhanced through providing them effective recognition which ultimately results in improved performance of organizations. Recognition programs demonstrate respect for employees. A meaningful, thoughtful employee appreciation program is about valuing employees' efforts and having respect for who they are and what they do (Hart, 2011).

According to Long and Shields (2010), recognition can be categorised into formal or informal, cash or noncash, and individual or collective. 2.5. Job Satisfaction Satisfaction is an evaluative term that describes an attitude of liking or disliking (Ivancevich, 2004). Hence, job satisfaction is a positive emotional state resulting from evaluating one’s job experience. On the other hand, dissatisfaction occurs when an individual’s expectations from the job are dashed. Mathis and Jackson (2004) explain that, the important factor in job satisfaction is what employees expect from their jobs and what they receive as rewards from their job.


Job satisfaction, as defined by Locke (1976) cited in Gruneberg, (1979, p. 3), is “a pleasurable positive emotional state as a result of work appraisal from one’s job experiences”. Reward and Recognition Many types of programs exist for the reward and recognition of the employees. According to Bowen (2002) a reward is something given or received against for a service. Benefits received by the workers doing their jobs are included in reward (Kalleberg 1977, Mottaz1988).

In simple words, a tangible gift which is given to one who has contributed something in organization. It can be of any form, a candy or monetary base. Reward can be given formally or informally or for completion of specific task. The acknowledgment of one‟s contribution to the organization in the eyes of public is called recognition (Bowen, 2002).

One of the vital factors, which effect the job satisfaction, is reward and recognition. Maurer (2001) emphasized that we should consider the link between organizational successes as the consequence of employee job satisfaction. Reward and recognition is proved key factors, which influence the employee job satisfaction (Jun et al., 2006).

No reward system and lack of recognition for completing the tasks, is the result of poor system, which is prevailing in typical organizations, such system that hinders in the way of supervisors to encourage their workers for doing a good job (Pascoe et al., 2002). Simply, poor reward and recognition system reduces job satisfaction. Cronin and Becherer (1999) emphasized that there is significant relation between reward and recognition and Jobsatisfaction as study conducted on nurses. There exist two major categories of reward; extrinsic and intrinsic.

In our study our focus revolves around extrinsic factors of reward system. Helms (2006) emphasized that extrinsic reward such as money and promotions are motivating factors for employees. Extrinsic reward as described by many researchers are all those tangible reward that organizations try to provide their workers for keeping them motivated and satisfied, like promotion, benefits, job security, pay, better working conditions (Kallberg,1977; Mottaz,1985; Price and Muller,1986; Tausky,1984). For getting good results, management should develop such reward and recognition system, which will enhance satisfaction of employees.

Review of Litreature

Jehanzeb et al (2018) studied the impact of rewards and motivation using perceived amount of rewards on job satisfaction in both public sector and private banks of Saudi Arabia. Through regression analysis they related the perceived amount of reward, motivation and job satisfaction. Results indicated that (a) rewards have a positive significance on job satisfaction, (b) motivation is positively related to job satisfaction, (c) motivation has a positive significant effect on job satisfaction. The study found out that employees of private and public sector in different banks are moderately rewarded, motivated and gratified in their organization. The study concluded that employees in banking sector give more importance to economic or financial rewards. Pratheepkantha (2019) studied impact of reward system on employee motivation in commercial banks of Sri Lanka. The study found out positive relationship of extrinsic and intrinsic reward on employee motivation. Secondly, higher performance consistency, cooperation, willingness of responsibility, challenging work, growth in job were found to be determining factors that influence employees’ performance. He suggested that the non-monetary rewards like holiday package, bonus, pension benefits, and overtime 15 pay should be improved by banks. The study mentioned about dissatisfaction of bank staff with financial rewards, responsibility, training and promotion. Khalid et al. (2020) explored impacts of employee’s rewards and employee’ motivation on employee’s job satisfaction between public and private water utility organization in Malaysia. Author took three factors under reward namely pay, autonomy, and co-workers relationship. Motivation was taken from extrinsic and intrinsic needs of employees and measured job satisfaction from nine dimensions namely, pay promotion, supervision, benefits, contingent rewards, operating procedures, co-workers, nature of work and communication. Study revealed that employee’s reward was positively related to motivation. Both employee’s reward and employee’s motivation were found to have positive influences on employees’ job satisfaction. The study comes out with some interesting findings like, employees in public water utility organization scored significantly higher level of employees’ reward, motivation and job satisfaction; and motivation have more impact on job satisfaction as compared to rewards in both public and private water utility organizations.


Shafiq and Naseem (2018) examined the association between rewards and employee motivation in banking sector of Pakistan. The study found positive relationship between reward and motivation. Authors also tried to identify the association of demographic factors like age, gender, educational qualification, experience, and income with the reward variables like good salary, interesting work, job security, promotion, appreciation, opportunity of advancement, loyalty to employees, sympathetic personal help, good working environment and other benefits. The study found out that gender is associated with salary, workload and praise, income is associated with bonus and incentives, and experience is associated with job security.

The results also showed that salary is much important factor for employee motivation as compared to other variable factors like promotion, job security, working condition, appreciation and other benefits Armstrong et al. (2019) explored the reasons of non-evaluation of effectiveness of reward policies and practices by the organizations. Authors observed the approaches used by the organizations to evaluate the effectiveness of their reward policies and practices, and developed evidenced based model to describe how evaluation take place.

This case study found that organizations where powerful tradition of human capital measurement, and highly disciplined as well as performance oriented approach to 16 measurement exists are interested in measuring the effectiveness of reward policies and practices. The study identified the reason on non-evaluation of effectiveness of reward system such as lack of resources and time, lack of information or data, senior management indifference, organization changes and lack of analytical skill. The study concluded that lack of resources or time is the most important reasons for non-evaluation of the effectiveness of reward system. The study found out that there is no set pattern of conducting an evaluation of effectiveness of reward policies and practices.

Methodology and Tools Adopted

The present research work is a descriptive and analytical study based on empirical observations and a comprehensive survey.

Both the Primary Data and Secondary Data were collected, analyzed and interpreted. The Sample Design is Based on convenient sampling and it is issued to 450 employees working in selected garment units in Tirupur District of Tamilnadu and Reliability analysis and factor analysis is adopted to assess.

Reliability Analysis

The reliability of scales used in this study was calculated by Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient normally ranges between 0 and 1. However, there is actually no lower limit to the coefficient.

The closer Cronbach’s alpha coefficient is to 1.0 the greater the internal consistency of the items in the scale. The coefficient alpha values exceeded the minimum standard of .70. It’s provided good estimates of internal consistency reliability.

  • The formula is as follows:
    mjar_20_01.JPG
  • K is the number of items in the scale.
  • R is the average correlation pairs of items.
  • As the number of items in the scale (k) increase, the value of alpha becomes larger.
  • If the inter-correlation between items is large, the corresponding alpha will also be larger.

It reveals that all the fourteen measurement scale items related to reward and recognition system followed in selected garments industries are reliable as the Cronbach alpha coefficient of 0.892 It is greater than the threshold level of 0.70.

It’s provided good estimates of internal consistency reliability and also coefficient alpha values ranged from 0.903 to 0.892 for all the constructs. It is indicating that the scales used in this study were reliable.

It clearly indicates that above scale items are consistent with each other and they are reliable measure of factors related to reward and recognition system followed in selected garments industries , so that it can be taken forward for factor analysis.


Table 1: Reliability For Factors Related To Reward And Recognition System Followed In Selected Garments Industries

S.NO.ITEMSSCALE MEAN IF ITEM DELETEDCRONBACH'S ALPHA IF ITEM DELETED
1Local recognition events are important in a recognition program124.9750.899
2Reward with special recognition by team management at team meetings125.1950.898
3Reward with certificate for “dinner for two” or evening out125.3650.898
4Recognition should be given for creative suggestions that improve performance125.3650.896
5Recognition should be given for significant achievement “on the spot”125.4550.895
6The primary value of recognition is acknowledgement of performance by management125.4250.895
7Senior management should determine who receives an award125.4150.895
8Team members should be able to nominate other team or peers outside of their team for an award125.2950.897
9Formal recognition events increase the motivational value of a recognition program125.2650.896
10Informal recognition is of equal importance as formal recognition events125.3050.903
11Broad recognition at a national event increases the motivational value of a recognition program125.2650.903
12People who perform their jobs well generally get rewarded125.1950.903
13Providing non-monetary recognition helps to achieve job goals125.1950.898
14Most of the recognition received is remembered fondly125.2150.898
MEAN125.281
VARIANCE169.11
STD. DEVIATION13.29
CRONBACH'S ALPHA0.892
NO. OF ITEMS14

Dimensionality of Multi-Scale Items (Factor Analysis)

Factor Analysis is a set of technique which by analyzing correlations between variables reduces their numbers into fewer factors which explain much of original data, more economically. Even though a subjective interpretation can result from a factor analysis output, procedure often provides an insight into relevant psychographic variables, and results in economic use of data collection efforts. The subjective element of factor analysis is reduced by splitting sample randomly into two and extracting factors separately from both parts. If similar factors result, analysis is assumed as reliable or stable

Table 2: Kmo And Bartlett’s Test For Factors Related To Factors Related To Reward And Recognition System Followed In Selected Garments Industries

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy0.756
Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity:  Approx. Chi-Square2241.35
Sig0.000**
S/NSS

**P<0.001 *P<0.05 S-Significant

From the above table 2, two tests namely, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity have been applied to test whether the relationship among the variables has been significant or not. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of sampling adequacy shows the value of test statistics is 0.756 which means the factor analysis for the selected variable is found to be appropriate or good to the data. Bartlett’s test of sphericity is used to test whether the data are statistically significant or not with the value of test statistics and the associated significance level. It shows that there exists a high relationship among variables. The results of the factor analysis presented in the table 1.3 factors related to, have revealed that there are fourteen factors that had Eigen value exceeding “one”. Among those four factors, the first factor accounted for 26.09 percent of the variance, the second 13.61 percent, the third factor 8.59 percent and the fourth factor 8.029 per cent of the variance in the data set. The first four factors are the final factors solution and they all together represent 56.325 percent of the total variance in the scale items measuring the factors related TO Reward And Recognition System Followed In Selected Garments Industries.


Table 3: Eigen Values And Proportion Of Total Variance Of Factors Related To Reward And Recognition System Followed In Selected Garments Industries

componentInitial Eigen valuesExtraction Sums of Squared LoadingsRotation Sums of Squared loadings
Total% of VarianceCumulative %Total% of VarianceCumulative %Total% of VarianceCumulative %
13.65326.09226.0923.65326.09226.0922.30516.46516.465
21.90613.61339.7051.90613.61339.7051.89213.51429.979
31.2038.59148.2951.2038.59148.2951.87213.37443.352
41.1248.02956.3251.1248.02956.3251.81612.97256.325

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis

Table 4: Rotated Component Matrix For Factors Related Reward And Recognition System Followed In Selected Garments Industries

Variable codeComponent
IIIIIIIV
x100.7580.2330.0640.042
x120.7210.2110.043-0.031
x80.652-0.1500.373-0.004
X90.6000.1600.3030.112
x130.1670.7530.120-0.095
X110.4590.648-0.0340.060
X40.0300.6010.2950.198
X140.4130.5910.210-0.282
X60.1440.0910.7420.073
X70.1580.3160.696-0.179
X50.1150.0470.6440.212
X20.0550.0630.1120.797
X10.112-0.179-0.0160.787
x3-0.2860.3940.1810.580

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. Rotation converged in 12 iterations.
Table 4 represents Rotated Component Matrix, which is an important output of principal component analysis. Coefficients are factor loadings which represents correlation between factors and twenty variables (X1 to X14). From above factor matrix it is found that coefficients for factor-I have high absolute correlations with variable X10(Informal recognition is of equal importance as formal recognition events),

X12(People who perform their jobs well generally get rewarded), X8 (Team members should be able to nominate other team or peers outside of their team for an award) and X9 (Formal recognition events increase the motivational value of a recognition program ) that is, 0.758, 0.721, 0.652 ,0.600 respectively.

Similarly factor-II has high absolute correlation with variable X13(Providing non-monetary recognition helps to achieve job goals), X11 (Broad recognition at a national event increases the motivational value of a recognition program), X4 (Recognition should be given for creative suggestions that improve performance ) and X14 (Most of the recognition received is remembered fondly), 0.753, 0.648, 0.601, and 0.591 respectively.

Next, factor III has high absolute correlation with variable X6 (The primary value of recognition is acknowledgement of performance by management), X7 (Senior management should determine who receives an award) and X5 (Recognition should be given for significant achievement “on the spot”), that is, 0.742,0.696 and 0.644 respectively.

Factor-IV has high absolute correlation with variable X2(Reward with special recognition by team management at team meetings), X1(Local recognition events are important in a recognition program) and X3 (Reward with certificate for “dinner for two” or evening out), that is, 0.797, 0.787 ,0.580 respectively

Table 5: Component Transformation Matrix

Component1234
10.7660.650.6330.173
2-0.1510.0750.3631.041
30.807-0.511-0.1530.353
40.2330.677-0.660.375

The above table reveals the factor correlation matrix. If the factors are uncorrelated among themselves, then in the factor correlation matrix, the diagonal elements will be 1’s and off diagonal elements will be 0’s.

Since matrix was rotated with Varimax, barring some variables all other variables are found to have, even if not zero correlations but fairly low correlation.

Thus the fourteen variables in the data were reduced to four Component factor.


Table 6: Showing The Factors Related Reward And Recognition System Followed In Selected Garments Industries

x10Informal recognition is of equal importance as formal recognition events0.57%Factor I
x12People who perform their jobs well generally get rewarded0.52%
x8Team members should be able to nominate other team or peers outside of their team for an award0.42%
X9Formal recognition events increase the motivational value of a recognition program0.41%
x13Providing non-monetary recognition helps to achieve job goals0.57%Factor II
X11Broad recognition at a national event increases the motivational value of a recognition program0.42%
X4Recognition should be given for creative suggestions that improve performance0.41%
X14Most of the recognition received is remembered fondly0.38%
X6The primary value of recognition is acknowledgement of performance by management0.55%Factor III
X7Senior management should determine who receives an award0.48%
X5Recognition should be given for significant achievement “on the spot”0.41%
X2Reward with special recognition by team management at team meetings0.63%Factor IV
X1Local recognition events are important in a recognition program0.62%
x3Reward with certificate for “dinner for two” or evening out0.45%

Conclusion

Reward management in a business organisation is basically the way in which that particular business forms and implements strategies and policies to reward the employees to a fair standard and in accordance with how the organisation values them. Reward management in a business organisation usually consists of the business analyzing and controlling the employee’s remuneration and all of the other benefits for the employees. The present study emphasises the factors related reward and recognition system followed in selected garments industries. It is evident that “Informal recognition is of equal importance as formal recognition” events followed by “People who perform their jobs well generally get rewarded” and Team members should be able to nominate other team or peers outside of their team for an award Formal recognition events

increase the motivational value of a recognition program are the most influencing factors among all which influences reward and recognition system followed in selected garment industries.

References

1. Baqir, M. ., Hussain, S. ., Waseem, R. ., & Islam, K. M. A. (2020). Impact of reward and recognition, supervisor support on employee engagement.American International Journal of Business and Management Studies,2(3), 8–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46545/aijbms.v2i3.256.
2. Akker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187-200.
3. Imran, A., Ahmad, S., Nisar, Q. A., & Ahmad, U. (2014). Exploring relationship among re-wards, recognition and employees’ job satisfaction: A descriptive study on libraries in Pakistan. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(9), 1533-1540.
4. Javed, M., & Balouch, R. (2014). Determinants of job satisfaction and its impact on employee performance and turnover intentions. International Journal of Learning & Development, 4(2), 120-140.
5. Nasir, S. Z., & Mahmood, N. (2018). A study of effect of employee retention on organisational competence. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 408–415.
6. Too, R., & Kwasira, Dr. J. (2017). Evaluation of employee retention practices to generation y at cooperative bank i n the county of Nairobi, Kenya. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(11), 43-53.
7. Zin, S. M, Ahmad, N., Ngah, N. E. B., Simail, R. B., Ibrahim, N. B., Abdullah, I. H. T. B., & Tajudin, N. H. B. A. (2012). Motivation model for employee retention: Applicability to HRM practices in Malaysian SME sector. Canadian Social Science, 8(5), 8-12.